Re: Faster read performance DURING (?) resync on raid10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 01:19:50AM +0200, Daniel Zetterman wrote:
> I've done some more tests and here are the results:
> 
> # bonnie++ during resync with readahead set to 512 (encrypted raid10)
> kpax,4G,,,77308,21,34585,17,,,82073,33,384.8,1,,,,,,,,,,,,,

It would be nice to know which layout (near,far,offset)
that you are using for the test. The expected results are quite
dependent on this.

best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux