On 14:12, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > >Nobody really cares about the partition type these days. I usually > >stick to the default 83 (Linux) for software raid partitions and > >never encountered any problems. > > This is a very flawed assumption. You will be surprised how many > utilities/live CDs are there in existence, which will selently attempt to > mount/fsck a partition based solely on its type. Well, I'd consider those utilities broken by design. If it is the exercise is to break as few utilities/live CDs as possible, I admit you'll have to care about partition types. It's a rather pointless exercise IMHO though. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
