Re: Proper partition type for components with V1.x superblocks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11:26, Peter Rabbitson wrote:

> The subject pretty much says it all - it obviously is not 0xFD, since there 
> is nothing to autodetect. Is there some best practice/semi-standard way of 
> marking a raid component partition as such?

Nobody really cares about the partition type these days. I usually
stick to the default 83 (Linux) for software raid partitions and
never encountered any problems.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux