Re: Multipath behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday April 22, bcrook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I am considering implementing multipath for iSCSI.  Documentation is
> scant though, so I thought I'd ask my questions here.
> 
> Does mdadm multipath loadbalance IO, or just allow for failover, or both?
> Is there any advantage to notifying mdadm pre-emptively if possible
> before a path goes down?
> I assume bringing a path online has to be done manually like adding a
> disk.  Can spare paths be used?
> 
> The kernel involved is 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.
> 
> Thank you for your time.

I recommend against using md based multipath.  It is not being
seriously maintained.
dm (aka device mapper) based multipath is where the action is.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux