On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:10:16AM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:06:44PM -0600, Maurice Hilarius wrote: > > Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > >.. > > >Hmm, would raid10,n2, or raid10,f2 then have these flaws too? > > > > > I do not know. > > I am, however, about to do some testing to find out. > > Our company routinely was using RAID1 on systems, until we discovered this. > > With no ability to boot from RAID5 and similar this leaves us in a bit > > of a bind. > > As raid10,n2 is data wise equivalent to RAID1, then grub/lilo should be > able to boot from raid10,n2. > > raid10,n2 should have better performance than RAID10, but raid10,f2 I meant: raid10,n2 should have better performance than RAID1 best regards keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
