I code, therefore I am
--- On Fri, 5/2/08, David Lethe <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snipped]
> I was being too literal. md is a good solution (I use it
> myself). However, the OP wanted to "Make sure that if
> one disk dies, the data is still in tact".
I was also concerned about performance. It seems that if the RAIDs will
be used heavily and independent of each other, and performance is a
concern, then dedicated disks (and possibly dedicated controllers)
are the better option.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
