Re: RAID5 in sync does not populate slots sequentially, shows array as (somewhat) faulty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hello,

Noticing the problems Tor Vestbø is having, I remembered that I have an array in a similar state, which I never figured out. The array has been working flawlessly for 3 months, the monthly 'check' runs come back with everything being clean. However this is how the array looks through mdadm's eyes:

I'm in agreement that something is odd about the disk numbers here, and I'm suspicious because I have never seen this with 0.90 superblocks. That doesn't mean it couldn't happen and I never noticed, it's certainly odd that four drives wouldn't be numbered 0..3, in raid5 they are all equally out of sync.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux