Re: Setting up md-raid5: observations, errors, questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Pernegger wrote:
 You could try to change cables and such but you've already cc'd linux-ide,
 AFAIK it can/could be a chipset/related issue and the guys who work on NCQ
 etc are working on the problem is the last I heard..

 You should try and narrow down the problem, is it always the same drive
 that has that problem every time?  Does it occur if you do a check on the
 RAID 5 array or only when building?  etc..

Assuming you're talking about the HSM violation error ... I got that
exactly once (yet) in the situation described (sometime after the
writing phase of badblocks). Nothing since and certainly not the spew
others are reporting.

Are you by any chance running quota?

My primary concern now is the second problem - seems like any access
to the raid array makes the machine unusable. I can type/edit a
command at the bash prompt normally but as soon as I hit enter it just
hangs there. If the command is trivial, say cat, I might get a result
a few minutes later.

bonnie++ results are in:

Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
1024k            4G           16282   5 13359   3           57373   7 149.0   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++

Something is definitely not right ... :-(

As in, an old array of 300GB IDE Maxtors has 4x the seq writes, bus
capped (105MB/s, plain PCI) reads and 3x the IOs. And it doesn't block
the machine. Granted, there's the crypto but on my other (non-raid)
boxes the performance impact just isn't there.

Any help appreciated, as it is the box has expensive-paperweight status.

C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux