Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Stoffel wrote:
[]
> C'mon, how many of you are programmed to believe that 1.2 is better
> than 1.0?  But when they're not different, just just different
> placements, then it's confusing.

Speaking of "more is better" thing...

There were quite a few bugs fixed in recent months wrt version 1
superblocks - both in kernel and in mdadm.  While 0.90 format is
stable for a very long time, and unless you're hitting its limits
(namely, max 26 drives in an array, no "homehost" field), there's
nothing which makes v1 superblocks better than 0.90 ones.

In my view, "better" = stable first, faster/easier/whatever second.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux