Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 Oct 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
>On Thursday October 25, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I also suspect that a *lot* of people will assume that the highest superblock
>> version is the best and should be used for new installs etc.
>
> Grumble... why can't people expect what I want them to expect?


Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> I expect it's because I used 1.2 superblocks (why
> not use the latest, I said, foolishly...) and therefore the RAID10 --

Aha - an 'in the wild' example of why we should deprecate '0.9 1.0 1.1, 1.2' and
rename the superblocks to data-version + on-disk-location :)


David





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux