Re: raid10 on three discs - few questions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday February 3, janek_listy@xxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Maybe I'll buy three HDDs to put a raid10 on them. And get the total
> capacity of 1.5 of a disc. 'man 4 md' indicates that this is possible
> and should work.
> 
> I'm wondering - how a single disc failure is handled in such configuration?
> 
> 1. does the array continue to work in a degraded state?

Yes.

> 
> 2. after the failure I can disconnect faulty drive, connect a new one,
>    start the computer, add disc to array and it will sync automatically?
> 

Yes.

> 
> Question seems a bit obvious, but the configuration is, at least for
> me, a bit unusual. This is why I'm asking. Anybody here tested such
> configuration, has some experience?
> 
> 
> 3. Another thing - would raid10,far=2 work when three drives are used?
>    Would it increase the read performance?

Yes.

> 
> 4. Would it be possible to later '--grow' the array to use 4 discs in
>    raid10 ? Even with far=2 ?
> 

No.

Well.... if by "later" you mean "in five years", then maybe.  But the
code doesn't currently exist.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux