On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:44:20PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Depending on near/far choices, raid10 should be faster than raid5, with > far read should be quite a bit faster. You can't boot off raid10, and if > you put your swap on it many recovery CDs won't use it. But for general > use and swap on a normally booted system it is quite fast. Hmm, why would you put swap on a raid10? I would in a production environment always put it on separate swap partitions, possibly a number, given that a number of drives are available. best regards keld - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
