Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> 
> In my 4 drive system, I'm clearly not getting 1+0's ability to use grub 
> out of the RAID10.  I expect it's because I used 1.2 superblocks (why 
> not use the latest, I said, foolishly...) and therefore the RAID10 -- 
> with even number of drives -- can't be read by grub. If you'd patch that 
> information into the man pages that'd be very useful indeed.

If you have 4 drives, I think the right thing is to use a raid1 with 4
drives, for your /boot partition. Then yo can survive that 3 disks
crash!


If you want the extra performance, then I think you should not bother
too much for the kernel and initrd load time - which of cause is not
striping on the disks, but some performance improvement can be expected.
Then you can have the rest of /root on a raid10,f2 with 4 disks.

best regards
keld
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux