Thiemo Nagel wrote:
Performance of the raw device is fair:
# dd if=/dev/md2 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 15.6071 seconds, 550 MB/s
Somewhat less through ext3 (created with -E stride=64):
# dd if=largetestfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 26.4103 seconds, 325 MB/s
Quite slow?
10 disks (raptors) raid 5 on regular sata controllers:
# dd if=/dev/md3 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 10.718 seconds, 801 MB/s
# dd if=bigfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
3640379392 bytes (3.6 GB) copied, 6.58454 seconds, 553 MB/s
Interesting. Any ideas what could be the reason? How much do you get
from a single drive? -- The Samsung HD501LJ that I'm using gives
~84MB/s when reading from the beginning of the disk.
With RAID 5 I'm getting slightly better results (though I really
wonder why, since naively I would expect identical read performance)
but that does only account for a small part of the difference:
16k read 64k write
chunk
size RAID 5 RAID 6 RAID 5 RAID 6
128k 492 497 268 270
256k 615 530 288 270
512k 625 607 230 174
1024k 650 620 170 75
What is your stripe cache size?
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
