Richard Scobie wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Is this anywhere near the top of the todo list, or for now raid10
users are bound to a maximum read speed of a two drive combination?
I have not done any testing with the md native RAID10 implementations,
so perhaps there are some other advantages, but have you tried setting
up your 4 drives as a RAID 0 made up of a pair of RAID1s?
The advantage is higher redundancy when I can have any two drives fail
in a x3 layout unlike the raid1/0 setup, although I sacrifice available
disk space. But yes, I agree that if I was after pure throughput raid1/0
would be more beneficial, with the downside of 1.5 disk failure redundancy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
