mdadm > 2.2 ver1 superblock regression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When I try to create a RAID1 array with ver 1.0 superblock using mdadm
> 2.2 I'm getting:
WARNING - superblock isn't sized correctly

Looking at the code (and adding a bit more debugging) it is clear that
all 3 checks fail in super1.c's calc_sb_1_csum()'s "make sure I can
count..." test.

Is this a regression in mdadm 2.4, 2.3.1 and 2.3 (NOTE: mdadm 2.2's
ver1 sb works!)?

please advise, thanks.
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux