On Thursday April 6, snitzer@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > When I try to create a RAID1 array with ver 1.0 superblock using mdadm > > 2.2 I'm getting: > WARNING - superblock isn't sized correctly > > Looking at the code (and adding a bit more debugging) it is clear that > all 3 checks fail in super1.c's calc_sb_1_csum()'s "make sure I can > count..." test. > > Is this a regression in mdadm 2.4, 2.3.1 and 2.3 (NOTE: mdadm 2.2's > ver1 sb works!)? Oh bother and tarnation!!!! (whatever that means). I've put a 64bit quantity (reshape_position) on a 32bit boundary, not a 64 bit boundary. That works fine on x86, but not in some other places. Seeing this hasn't made it into a released kernel yet, I might just change it. But I'll have to make sure that old mdadm's don't mess things up ... I wonder how I will do that :-( Thanks for the report. NeilBrown > > please advise, thanks. > Mike > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
