Re: array size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ming Zhang (mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx) [051213 16:15]:
> 4 disks, 0 spare, so 3x capacity
> 586075008 = 3 x 195358336
> 
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 10:01 -0600, Sharif Islam wrote:
> > Shouldn't the size of the array be around 760GB? It says spare device 0.

> > /dev/md0:
> >         Version : 00.90.01
> >   Creation Time : Mon Dec 12 15:56:58 2005
> >      Raid Level : raid5
> >      Array Size : 586075008 (558.92 GiB 600.14 GB)
> >     Device Size : 195358336 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)

The description of the field is a little confusing.  It should read
"Netto Array Size" or "Available Disk Space" or some.  Then it is clear
that the last disk is excluded from the shown size.
-- 
Regards,

               MarkOv

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Mark Overmeer MSc                                MARKOV Solutions
       Mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx                          solutions@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://Mark.Overmeer.net                   http://solutions.overmeer.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux