Re: array size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4 disks, 0 spare, so 3x capacity

586075008 = 3 x 195358336

ming


On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 10:01 -0600, Sharif Islam wrote:
> Shouldn't the size of the array be around 760GB? It says spare device 0.
> 
> /dev/md0:
>         Version : 00.90.01
>   Creation Time : Mon Dec 12 15:56:58 2005
>      Raid Level : raid5
>      Array Size : 586075008 (558.92 GiB 600.14 GB)
>     Device Size : 195358336 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 4
>   Total Devices : 4
> Preferred Minor : 0
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> 
>     Update Time : Tue Dec 13 09:59:54 2005
>           State : clean
>  Active Devices : 4
> Working Devices : 4
>  Failed Devices : 0
>   Spare Devices : 0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux