On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:30:09PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote: > If a little downtime is no big deal, and you could use a little extra > disk space, then sure, don't mirror swap. > > If downtime is more important than the loss of a little disk space, then > do mirror swap. > > Before you say that disk is always cheaper than downtime, recall that > sometimes there'll be a layer of bureaucracy between you and the > purchase of a new disk. But in that case if you mirror swap then you can have the pleasure of working through the bureaucracy while the server is still up. :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature