Re: sata_nv and RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Molle Bestefich wrote:

>Michael Tokarev wrote:
>  
>
>>Without proper error handling [...]
>>linux SATA subsystem isn't ready for production,
>>and people should not rely on it *now*.
>>    
>>
>
>As long as disks aren't removed, it's OK for production..
>
>But I'll agree with anyone who says that IDE under Linux just sucks
>donkey ass compared to IDE under Windows.  With Windows 2K and later,
>unplugging both SATA and PATA devices Just Works (tm).  I'm having a
>hard time figuring how this works: there's enough people supporting
>Linux to build a complete web-enabled SCM system (git) in a couple of
>weeks,
>
SW engineering

> but noone has bothered to fix this glaring flaw for the past 5
>years? 
>
HW engineering

> What gives?
>  
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux