Re: sata_nv and RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Without proper error handling [...]
> linux SATA subsystem isn't ready for production,
> and people should not rely on it *now*.

As long as disks aren't removed, it's OK for production..

But I'll agree with anyone who says that IDE under Linux just sucks
donkey ass compared to IDE under Windows.  With Windows 2K and later,
unplugging both SATA and PATA devices Just Works (tm).  I'm having a
hard time figuring how this works: there's enough people supporting
Linux to build a complete web-enabled SCM system (git) in a couple of
weeks, but noone has bothered to fix this glaring flaw for the past 5
years?  What gives?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux