On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:53:52PM +0200, Frank Wittig wrote: > >>And those who do can type: > >> fdisk -l /dev/sda | grep -i fd | cut -f1 -d' ' | xargs -n1 mdadm -r > > > > > > I really don't like kludgy things like that... > [...] > > Isn't the insertion/removal of a disk common enough to justify the > > addition of a simple and clean mdadm option? > have you thought about the idea that there is a certain clue behind the > actual behaviour of the mdadm tool? > is it so annoying to you to mark a disk/partition as faulty before > removing it? I'm sorry, but having to do a cat /proc/mdstat, figure out by myself what to do (which partition is concerned), then type several commands (for each concerned partition) actually is painful. Maybe you are an experienced guy so it seems so simple to you... but I'm always amused when an experienced guy refuses to make things simpler for those who aren't as much as he is. And sends them to Microsoft. Great. This mailing-list is probably full of kernel guys, so maybe I should have guessed. But I come here as a user (who wants RAID to work as smoothly as possible), having found no other mailing-list (a user one) for RAID on Linux. (did I miss it?) Maybe I'm not asking questions to the right people, but for me, computer science is about automating things. And the process or replacing a crashed disk (described above) on a system managed with mdadm is not particularly automated, right? Maybe it's not a problem for _you_, because you know exactly what to do by heart. So you've forgotten the complexity. But it's there, and even if it's good that you can do complex and powerful things, it's not normal to force people to get into that complexity to do simple things. Think about it. > do you think it makes sense to implement every single case in an extra > command line option? I personnaly do not consider that this is yet another case. For me, RAID is about have disk availability, right? So the most common production case is definitely when one of your disks crashed, and you want to replace it. There must be some kind of way to deal with that without typing too much contextual command lines. Whether this simple way should belong to mdadm is another question, but I personnaly think it should, as it would introduce no overhead (would it, really ?) and would be very helpful. Let me reassure you, you could stay with several commands if you like. :-) > did you ever thought about switching to a hardware where you can remove > and add disks without having to do anything else than pull the old one > out and push teh new one in? Ok, here we are... [First, the RAID controller I'm forced to deal with has no Linux driver, but that's not important for our discussion.] Software RAID is about doing the same that hardware RAID, but in soft. I think we agree on that. ;-) So I see absolutely no reason why software RAID should not be as simple as possible. And RAID management with mdadm could be made simpler for a common case like that. > i run several raid arrays on many machines and i find the tools quite > useful. They are. They could be even more if things were as simple as possible. > if you mind such command lines like the one above you should > think about switching to a microsoft product where you can push your > mouse arround and tell everyone that you can do what you want without > those kludgy command lines which no one really understands. > so please ask and learn. You tell me to ask and learn from kernel guys who like to type command lines (I do, but I don't want to force everyone to do so). So maybe I can tell you to please learn from users who like the command line, but try to make simple things as simple as possible. > there are many people on this list which are pleased to answer your > questions. > the idea behind *n?x systems is to combine simple functionality through > pipes and redirects to gain unlimited complexy and power. so if you want > to use the full power of *n?x systems you have to get used to this > "kludgy" command lines. I don't agree with that. Using grep on vague patterns is not what I call power. Having to type several commands when one would be enough (I insist that I think we are talking about one of the most common cases) is not powerful, according to me. My motto is "be as complex as possible for people who want power (you, and sometimes me), but be as simple as possible for people who just want things to be done quickly, simply, and efficiently (sometimes me, and all the others)". > the more you get used to it, the less "kludgy" they will be. Of course, but the very idea is that one shouldn't have to get used to it too much to perform simple and common actions. But I guess we'll never agree anyway... :-( Herve -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
