Re: [Evms-devel] 2.6.10-ac10 + 2.6.10udm1 + latest evms => not nice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 21 January 2005 8:47 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2005-01-21T15:13:26, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Don't know if it's related to evms or to dm.
> > kernel is a 2.6.10-ac10 + 2.6.10-udm1 + evms kernel patches.
> > (bd_claims + dm bbr + dm multipath)
> >
> > Here is the nice welcome message I've just got :)
>
> This looks like md on DM breakage, which Jens has just fixed in our
> kernel. I'm not sure whether he has submitted it upstream yet, but you
> can give it a try.
>
> Does the attached patch apply & fix the problem for you?

>    If md resides on top of a driver using bio_clone() (such as dm), it will
>    oops the kernel due to md submitting a botched bio that has a veclist but
>    doesn't have bio->bi_max_vecs set.

Is there a specific scenario that causes the kernel to oops if an MD device is 
made of DM devices? EVMS has been using this kind of configuration for a 
couple years, and we've never noticed a problem with it. Also, syrius 
mentioned on IRC that this problem only started occurring with -ac10, and 
that -ac8 worked fine. I'm checking out the diffs between those two versions 
to see what else might have changed.

-- 
Kevin Corry
kevcorry@xxxxxxxxxx
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux