On Thursday 06 January 2005 18:31, Guy wrote:
> This idea of splitting larger disks into smaller partitions, then
> re-assembling them seems odd. But it should help with the "bad block kicks
> out a disk" problem.
Yes. And I'm absolutely sure I read it on linux-raid. Couple of months back.
> However, if you are going to use LVM anyway, why not allow LVM to assemble
> the disks? I do that sort of thing all the time with HP-UX. I create
> stripped mirrors using 4 or more disks. With HP-UX, use the -D option with
> lvcreate. No idea if Linux and LVM can strip.
I think so. But I am more familiar with md, so I'll still use that. In any
case LVM's striping is akin raid-0, whereas I will definitely use raid-5.
> You are making me think! I hate that! :) Since your 6 RAID5 arrays are
;-) Terrible, isn't it.
> on the same 4 disks, striping them will kill performance. The poor heads
> will be going from 1 end to the other, all the time. You should use LINEAR
> is you combine them with md. If you use LVM, make sure it does not stripe
> them. With LVM on HP-UX, the default behavior is to not stripe.
Exactly what I thought. That they are on the same disks should not matter;
only when one full md set (6-1)*40GB=200GB is full (or used, or whatever)
will the "access" move on to the next set of drives. It is indeed imperative
to NOT have LVM striping (nor use raid-0, thanks for observing that!), as
that would be totally counterproductive and may thus kill performance.
(r/w head thrashing)
For all clarity, this is how it would look:
md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdb1[1] sdc1[2] sdd1[3]
40000000 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]
...
...
...
md5 : active raid5 sda6[0] sdb6[1] sdc6[2] sdd6[3]
40000000 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]
The lvm part is still new to me, but the goal is simply to add all PVs /dev/
md0 through /dev/md5 to one LV yielding... well, a very large volume. :-)
I was planning to do this quickly tonight, but I've overlooked one essential
thing ;-| The old server has already 220 GB of data built of 4 80GB disks in
raid-5. But I cannot connect all 8 disks at the same time, so I'll have to
'free up' another system to define the arrays and copy the data over Gbit
LAN. I definitely don't want to lose the data!
What complicates this a bit is that I wanted to copy the OS verbatim (it is
not part of that raid-5 set, just raid-1). But I suppose booting a rescue CD
would enable me to somehow netcat the OS over to the new disks...
We'll see.
But for now I'm searching my home for a spare system with SATA onboard... :-)
Maarten
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
