Re: Which drive gets read in case of inconsistency? [was: ext3 journal on software raid etc]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 04 January 2005 13:44, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hm, Peter, you did it again.  At the very end of an admittedly interesting 
discussion you come out with the baseless assumptions and conclusions.
Just when I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt...

>
> Anyway, strictly speaking, the answer to your question is "yes". It
> does not decrease the probability, and therefore it increases it. The
> question is by how much, and that is unanswerable.

You continue to amaze me. If it does not decrease, it automatically 
increases ??  What happened to the "stays equal" possibility ?
Do you exclusively use ">" and "<" instead of "=" in your math too ?  

Maybe the increase is zero. Oh wait, it could even be negative, right ? Just 
as with probability. So it possibly has an increase of, say, -0.5 ?
(see how easy it is to confuse people ?)

Maarten

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux