MTBF is statistic based upon the expected 'use' of the drive and the replacement of the drive after its end of life (3-5 years)... It's extremely complex and boring but the figure is only relative if the drive is being used within an environment that matches those of the calculations. SATA / IDE drives have an MTBF similar to that of SCSI / Fibre. But this is based upon their expected use... i.e. SCSI used to be [power on hours = 24hr] [use = 8 hours].. whilst SATA used to be [power on = 8 hours] and [use = 20 mins]. Regardless of what some people clam (usually those that only sell sata based raids), the drives are not constructed the same in any way. SATA's fail more within a raid environment (probably around 10:1) because of the heavy use and also because they are not as intelligent... therefore when they do not respond we have no way of interrogating them or resetting them, whilst with scsi we do both. This means that a raid controller / driver has no option to but simply fail the drive. Maxtor lead the way in capacity and also reliability... I personal had to recall countless earlier IBMs and replace them with maxtor. But the new generation of IBM's (Hitachi) have got it together. So - I guess you are all right :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
