Re: Raid Failed What to to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Looks Bad :(

with mkraid i get the following output in /var/log/syslog

May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: md: bind<hde1>
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: md: bind<hdi1>
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: md: bind<hdk1>
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: raid5: device hdk1 operational as raid disk 3
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: raid5: device hdi1 operational as raid disk 2
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: raid5: device hde1 operational as raid disk 0
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: raid5: cannot start dirty degraded array for md0
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: --- rd:4 wd:3 fd:1
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:hde1
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: disk 2, o:1, dev:hdi1
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: disk 3, o:1, dev:hdk1
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: raid5: failed to run raid set md0
May 23 19:13:47 utgard kernel: md: pers->run() failed ...


so i tried mdadm with the options from raidtab

mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 5 -c 32 -p left-symmetric -n 4 /dev/hde1 /dev/hdi1 /dev/hdk1 missing /dev/hdg1

this seems to work, the raid startet without any error
but when i try to mount the array i geht

utgard:~# mount /dev/md0 /mnt/hdd1/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0,
      or too many mounted file systems

a cfdisk tries to start with with a zero table.

any ideas ?

Dominik


Guy wrote:


This is an example for using mdadm where the second of three disks is bad.
But you must use the same chunk size and other RAID5 parameters or the array
will have bogus data.  It would be nice if you still have the original
command you used to create the array.

mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 5 -n 3 /dev/hda3 missing /dev/hdc3

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: Guy [mailto:bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:00 AM
To: 'Clemens Schwaighofer'; 'Dominik Sennfelder'
Cc: 'linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Raid Failed What to to


If you re-make the array with the same parameters as it has now the data
will not be lost (assuming it is still there now).  If 1 disk is really bad
then leave it out.

The procedures depend on which program you use to create the array.  Do you
use mkraid or mdadm?

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clemens Schwaighofer
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 4:45 AM
To: Dominik Sennfelder
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Raid Failed What to to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dominik Sennfelder wrote:
| Hello
|
| I have got a Raid 5 with 4 160 GB Disk,
| On of the Disks Failed because. But I know its OK I had this for some
| times.
| A Restart solved The Problem.
| But now  Tried to raidhotremove the Drive and removed the wrong drive.
| I just recongized the Problem after i raidhotadded itagain.
| No the Raid tries to sync again.

well if you removed two drives from your Raid5 array, it might got
competly out of sync and then there is no way to recover. I have never
tried this with my raid, but if you add another disk it well be
re-synced, ergo it tries to rebuild the array out of the CRCs on the
other drives, if you remove two, you don't have enough redudant data to
do this (raid 6 can recover from a 2 drive failure).

I hope you have a backup.

- --
Clemens Schwaighofer - IT Engineer & System Administration
==========================================================
TEQUILA\Japan, 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN
Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703            Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343
http://www.tequila.co.jp
==========================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFArcGmjBz/yQjBxz8RAkYKAJ9TAc03OnmIth/M03xBmopKerZLOQCcCiiG
wk/lAjdcrd1jPWSoLyOGLAE=
=5uyj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html





- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux