On Tuesday December 16, fserb@campogeral.com.br wrote:
> Fernando Serboncini wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.0-test11/drivers/md/md.c 2003-11-26 18:43:29.000000000 -0200
> > +++ linux/drivers/md/md.c 2003-12-10 23:29:33.000000000 -0200
> > @@ -3290,6 +3290,8 @@
> > currspeed =
> > (j-mddev->resync_mark_cnt)/2/((jiffies-mddev->resync_mark)/HZ +1) +1;
> >
> > if (currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_min) {
> > + set_user_nice(current,19);
> > +
> > if ((currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_max) ||
> > !is_mddev_idle(mddev)) {
> > current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > @@ -3297,6 +3299,8 @@
> > goto repeat;
> > }
> > }
> > + else
> > + set_user_nice(current,-20);
> > }
> > printk(KERN_INFO "md: md%d: sync done.\n",mdidx(mddev));
> > /*
> >
>
> For what've seen, this causes no harm at all.
> Can anyone confirm that this is the right thing to do with the
> "blocking" issue?
Sorry for not replying earlier. I was on leave in December and never
got back to this.
This shouldn't be needed any longer. Have you tried a recent kernel
without this patch?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
