Re: raid1 critical sections not protected in 2.4.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2003-10-13T14:29:30,
   Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> said:

> Could you provide a pointer to those md locking fixes?

I'm on a train right now :), but I believe I put a copy of the most
recent version at ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/lmb/md/md-locking. If
not, I'll put them there as soon as possible ;-)

Neil is currently travelling too, so he hadn't had time to review it
yet. My version deviates from his to fix some races which we found.

There's some more work I think needs doing, namely moving all of the md
global structs and arrays into a single struct md_whatever[] for
tidyness, but I'm not sure whether I still want to touch the 2.4 code at
all ;-)


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering		ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SuSE Labs				try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG		-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux