On 2003-10-09T10:41:59,
Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> said:
> I have been looking at the raid1.c code. There is a kernel thread
> raid1d that could be scheduled on processor A. Then on processor B,
> other raid code could be scheduled as per each block I/O request.
Did you follow the recent locking fixes to md I discussed with Neil? I
think this fixes some of these; at least we have a confirmation from IBM
that some raid1 races (not resyncing after a hotadd, no progress during
resync etc) went away with it.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SuSE Labs try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG -- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
