Could you provide a pointer to those md locking fixes? Thanks! -steve On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 01:14, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2003-10-09T10:41:59, > Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> said: > > > I have been looking at the raid1.c code. There is a kernel thread > > raid1d that could be scheduled on processor A. Then on processor B, > > other raid code could be scheduled as per each block I/O request. > > Did you follow the recent locking fixes to md I discussed with Neil? I > think this fixes some of these; at least we have a confirmation from IBM > that some raid1 races (not resyncing after a hotadd, no progress during > resync etc) went away with it. > > > Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-BrÃe <lmb@suse.de> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
