On Wednesday 03 September 2003 03:51, Michael Welsh Duggan wrote: > Sorry about putting the wrong email address on my initial email. > > In reply to Donghui Wen, Yes, it was partitioned correctly. > > In reply to Bernd Schubert, I have installed mdadm, and am looking > around for some pointers. I am unsure what is going on still. mdadm > reports the follownig for /dev/md1: > > /dev/md1: > Version : 00.90.00 > Creation Time : Sun Mar 16 21:42:44 2003 > Raid Level : raid1 > Array Size : 6144704 (5.86 GiB 6.29 GB) > Device Size : 6144704 (5.86 GiB 6.29 GB) > Raid Devices : 2 > Total Devices : 2 > Preferred Minor : 1 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Update Time : Mon Sep 1 19:48:11 2003 > State : dirty, no-errors > Active Devices : 2 > Working Devices : 2 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 3 65 0 active sync > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1 1 0 0 0 > sync > 2 22 1 2 active > /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part1 UUID : > 0e953226:03c91d46:cd00d52f:83a1334e > Events : 0.413 > > > /proc/mdstat reports the following: > > md1 : active raid1 ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part1[2] > ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1[0] > 6144704 blocks [2/2] [U_] > > I'll play around with it some more, but it anyone recognizes these > symptoms, please reply. Hello Michael, perhaps the same issue that David Chow had a few weeks ago? See the attached mail, you will also find it in the archives. Bernd PS: I removed the attachment for the ML, as its anyway in the archives. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
