Sorry about putting the wrong email address on my initial email.
In reply to Donghui Wen, Yes, it was partitioned correctly.
In reply to Bernd Schubert, I have installed mdadm, and am looking
around for some pointers. I am unsure what is going on still. mdadm
reports the follownig for /dev/md1:
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90.00
Creation Time : Sun Mar 16 21:42:44 2003
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 6144704 (5.86 GiB 6.29 GB)
Device Size : 6144704 (5.86 GiB 6.29 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 1
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Mon Sep 1 19:48:11 2003
State : dirty, no-errors
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 3 65 0 active sync /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1
1 0 0 0 sync
2 22 1 2 active /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part1
UUID : 0e953226:03c91d46:cd00d52f:83a1334e
Events : 0.413
/proc/mdstat reports the following:
md1 : active raid1 ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part1[2]
ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1[0]
6144704 blocks [2/2] [U_]
I'll play around with it some more, but it anyone recognizes these
symptoms, please reply.
--
Michael Welsh Duggan
(mwd@cert.org)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
