I am doing a sparc thingin. I have to build the disk images on a x86 system, and move the disk to my sparc, for debug/test. Everhting works fine, except the MD's SB. I tweaked a bit on MD driver, then everything is good. I would think that MD should take care the SB format in next release. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Tran" <mhtran@us.ibm.com> To: "Matthew Mitchell" <matthew@geodev.com> Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:17 PM Subject: Re: Move md raid5 from intel to sparc? > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:03, Matthew Mitchell wrote: > > > What _about_ the filesystem and data, though? Some filesystems are > > certainly written in a known byte-order, like ISO 9660. Are there any > > of (ext3, XFS, JFS, reiserfs) that this is true for? Or are they all > > written in cpu native byte-order? > > Just look at the current releases of kernel, 2.4 and 2.5, all of the > above filesytems seem to write metadata using one known byte-order (ei. > always BE or always LE). Now all we need is testing. > > -Mike Tran > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
