This makes sense, because I upgraded (not reinstalled) my SuSE 7.3 -> 8.0 when running tests. 7.3 comes with the old driver and formatted the drive with 3.5.x format. On my other box, the one that the tests worked out correctly on, I am running ReiserFS v3.6.25 format. Thanks for pointing that out to me. It been really helpful. ------------------------------------ Mike Duncan Web Master/Developer Sonopress LLC mike.duncan@sonopress.com 828.658.6082 (desk) 828.423.3310 (cell) ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Bernd Schubert [mailto:bernd-schubert@web.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:46 PM To: Duncan, Mike; 'linux-raid@vger.kernel.org' Subject: Re: MD/RAID1 Large File Support > trans len 1024, max batch 900, max commit age 30, max trans age 30 > reiserfs: checking transaction log (md0) for (md0) > Using r5 hash to sort names > reiserfs: using 3.5.x disk format ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hi, there is no 2GB support with reiserfs-3.5. You have used Suses default reiserfs-utils, didn't you ? Well, the tools from namesys.com have 3.6 as default since ages, the tools by patched by Suse do have 3.5 . Try to convert with '-o conv' on mounting. If you plan to export this partition by nfs, you should consider to reformat, since the old files are not updated by -oconv, only new files will be in 3.6 format. Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
