Re: RAID 5 performance problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ross Vandegrift wrote:

> > I've benchmarked RAW disk speeds with an Ultra-100 and
> > WD1200JB drives, and gotten 50MB/S from each disk, as opposed to your
> > 26MB/S (there should be almost no difference for the BB drives).
>
> Makes perfect sense - he's getting 50M/s to each channel, but it's split
> over two drives, so drive throughput is about halved.
the fasttrak-tx4 is an 4 channel controller (it is an dual ultra-100 on 1
pci board)
Jonathans WD1200BB's should be a bit faster than 30MB/sec maybe, but the
main problem is his /dev/md0...

> Absolutely correct - you should *never* run IDE RAID on a channel that
> has both a master and slave.  When one disk on an IDE channel has an
Jonathan is only using master devices, no slaves...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux