Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 12 - Missing mddev_put in md resync code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On  March 12, skormilo@nortelnetworks.com wrote:
> Neil,
> 
> Are these patches safe to apply against 2.4 kernels?

No.  There have been lots of changes since 2.4.  Some patches might
conceptually apply, but they would need a bit of work to make them
actually apply.

> 
> It looks like one or more of these might reduce the chances of the
> kernel oops I experience on occasion when manipulating arrays.

Would this be when removing a recently-failed device?  That can still
oops.  I should send in a patch for that...

> 
> Also, this appears to change some of the way rebuilds are done, and am
> interested to see if this impacts some of the rebuild performance issues
> I've been seeing.

These patches are about management, not performance.  They won't
affect rebuild performance at all.  It is already quite good in 2.4 I
believe.  But maybe my experience is different from your.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux