Re: recovering after a /dev/sda failure on raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:15:54PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday August 5, vindex@apartia.org wrote:
> > 
> > FWIW the disk that is malfunctioning is a 3-month-old Fujitsu 15k 36G
> > (MAM3367MP) which is an expensive server-grade disk. The reason I
> > selected Fujitsu was because of reported quality problems on IBM disks
> > and Fujitsu's good reputation on SCSI (their IDE line is bad however).
> > I am looking for informed opinions on these disks and recommendations
> > for future purchases. What are the most reliable SCSI disks out there?
> > 
> > It must be: fast, affordable, reliable, (select any two ;-)
> 
> Somehow, I wish you hadn't said that.....

Sorry, but I thoroughly checked the disk after taking it off the server
and a lot of sectors are damaged, reiserfsck quits with a "can't read",
and the spindle makes bad noises.

> I just recently commissioned a fileserver with 14 Fujitsu MAM3367MC drives.
> I wander what the difference between P and C is...

It must be for 68 or 80 pin (ours is a 68).

> Previously we have used Seagates which have seemed quite reliable.
> The only real problems that we have had is with the IBM IDE DeathStars
> (oops, I meant DeskStars.  Naughty keyboard).

Had a sorry experience with these as well, a 75 G.

-- 
ldm@apartia.org 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux