Re: SW RAID6 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On the other hand, a cleverly distributed RAID10 can guard against a 
> controller failure in a 2-controller setup ; a RAID6 of more than 4 
> disks can't unless you use a maximum of 2 disks per controller.

Well, that is the case with all of the IDE arrays I've ever managed.

> How about not adding a RAID6 driver, but extending the RAID5 driver some 
> to make the number of parity stripes a variable? I don't know how much 
> extension that would require - perhaps it would bog down the RAID5 
> driver too much in single stripe use, so we still might be better off 
> with a separate RAID6(+) driver. But it looks like most of the code 
> could simply be copied.

Hmmm, I think you've convinced me that, should we get RAID6(+) support,
I'd give it a good shot.  This sounds like something my boss would be
all about...

Ross Vandegrift
ross@willow.seitz.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux