Re: mdadm 0.7 shows identical information raid1 members of raid0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md/3 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got
> > 77315132).

After thinking about this, maybe it's worth it to have the error say:

mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md/3 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
77315132). Maybe you meant --detail?

Or have -E try -D if this error is returned, while outputting some
warning. It seems like it's going to be a common mistake.

---
Derek Vadala, derek@cynicism.com, http://www.cynicism.com/~derek


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux