On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 21:16 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I have been told downstream[1] that there is an AppArmor profile that > is worked on by people from Debian, Ubuntu and OpenSUSE. I have been > asked to include it in the debian package but it seems to me that this > benefits most if included uptream. > > Would you be accepting of patches regarding apparmor profiles? An > apparmor profiles is AFAICT just a file that lists certain permissions > that pulseaudio needs (eg, write access to /run/user/$uid/pulse). If > the profile is badly written, it could result in errors as pulseaudio > won't have permission to do what it wants. It is my understanding that > Ubuntu already uses this profile so it has at least some testing in > the wild. > If a user does not have AppArmor installed, the profile becomes a NOP. > > According to the submitter, the apparmor people are more than happy to > assist if/when problems arise due to the pulseaudio profile. > > What do you think? > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/857798 At least I'm ok with including the apparmor profile upstream. -- Tanu https://www.patreon.com/tanuk
