On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 21:16 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> I have been told downstream[1] that there is an AppArmor profile that >> is worked on by people from Debian, Ubuntu and OpenSUSE. I have been >> asked to include it in the debian package but it seems to me that this >> benefits most if included uptream. >> >> Would you be accepting of patches regarding apparmor profiles? An >> apparmor profiles is AFAICT just a file that lists certain permissions >> that pulseaudio needs (eg, write access to /run/user/$uid/pulse). If >> the profile is badly written, it could result in errors as pulseaudio >> won't have permission to do what it wants. It is my understanding that >> Ubuntu already uses this profile so it has at least some testing in >> the wild. >> If a user does not have AppArmor installed, the profile becomes a NOP. >> >> According to the submitter, the apparmor people are more than happy to >> assist if/when problems arise due to the pulseaudio profile. >> >> What do you think? >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/857798 > > At least I'm ok with including the apparmor profile upstream. > OK, I'll let them know to forward the patch here. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
