On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 13:42 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 28.03.2016 12:13, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > > Our current way of doing things is good for keeping up code quality, > > but I think over time, with such a large patch backlog, we end up > > spending more and more time performing reviews, and less and less time > > working on features. This becomes quite draining and drops our overall > > productivity in contributing to the project. > I think it is in our interests to think how to get these features, where > possible, without reviewing too many patches and without sacrificing the > code quality of PulseAudio. That includes encouraging our contributors > to implement features externally to PulseAudio if it is easier. And an > external module SDK would also be a step forward. I think there's still enough stuff that belongs in PulseAudio that we need to deal with this problem internally anyway. -- Arun
