On 22/07/16 11:14, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, at 03:49 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote: >> >> Hopefully that's sufficient for now? > > Yes, it is. I think the patches you posted look good. Just one question > -- you moved missing and requested to being size_ts. Is there a reason > you don't leave them as int64_ts and avoid the casts in comparison? > This was to properly solidify the concept that these can never be negative, which was the source of the earlier confusion. size_t seemed to be the type used in the rest of the API for such things. Thanks for merging. Any chance you could have a look at my tunnel module patches next? :) Regards -- Pierre Ossman Software Development Cendio AB http://cendio.com Teknikringen 8 http://twitter.com/ThinLinc 583 30 Linköping http://facebook.com/ThinLinc Phone: +46-13-214600 http://plus.google.com/+CendioThinLinc A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
