On 4 August 2016 at 13:49, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:35:57 Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> This may very well cause a regression for BlueZ 4, because I didn't >> make the corresponding changes there. The code isn't identical with >> BlueZ 5, and it would be a bit difficult for me to test with BlueZ 4. >> What do others think - should I nevertheless try to install BlueZ 4 >> and update the BlueZ 4 code too, or can we let the BlueZ 4 code just >> rot? > > I have only Bluez 4, so please do not drop Bluez 4 code. If you to do > testing code for Bluez 4 setup, I can do that. Out of curiosity, what distro is this? From what I can look at, only SourceMage still has bluez 4, and both Debian and Ubuntu moved to bluez 5 in their latest (LTS) release. >From what I know, the pulseaudio maintainers use Debian, Fedora and Gentoo (I may be wrong though). As all of these distros have moved to bluez 5, I think it is kind of inevitable that bluez 4 code will bitrot. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
