On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:35:57 Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > This may very well cause a regression for BlueZ 4, because I didn't > make the corresponding changes there. The code isn't identical with > BlueZ 5, and it would be a bit difficult for me to test with BlueZ 4. > What do others think - should I nevertheless try to install BlueZ 4 > and update the BlueZ 4 code too, or can we let the BlueZ 4 code just > rot? I have only Bluez 4, so please do not drop Bluez 4 code. If you to do testing code for Bluez 4 setup, I can do that. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20160804/0180e93c/attachment.sig>
