[PATCH 0/5] Fix the conflict between bluetooth-policy and card-restore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:35:57 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> This may very well cause a regression for BlueZ 4, because I didn't
> make the corresponding changes there. The code isn't identical with
> BlueZ 5, and it would be a bit difficult for me to test with BlueZ 4.
> What do others think - should I nevertheless try to install BlueZ 4
> and update the BlueZ 4 code too, or can we let the BlueZ 4 code just
> rot?

I have only Bluez 4, so please do not drop Bluez 4 code. If you to do 
testing code for Bluez 4 setup, I can do that.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20160804/0180e93c/attachment.sig>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux