On 14 December 2015 at 09:54, David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-12-14 13:48, Arun Raghavan wrote: >> >> On 14 December 2015 at 17:58, David Henningsson >> <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: >>> >>> My understanding of all this is a bit limited, but it seems we already do >>> this for libpulsecommon without issue. >>> >>> I'm not sure how much it is upstream and how much is packaging, but on my >>> Ubuntu system it looks like /usr/bin/pulseaudio (and libpulse.so) both >>> have >>> a >>> >>> RPATH /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pulseaudio >>> >>> ...that cause us to find libpulsecomon (and presumably, libpulsecore). I >>> thought we weren't using RPATH, but apparently I'm mistaken. >>> >>> Anyhow. If nobody else complains I don't mind this one going in. Anyone >>> with >>> more knowledge who can fill in? >> >> >> This one does look okay to go in from my side. afaik we do use rpath >> on Linux (doesn't work with Android/bionic-based stuff, though). > > > Ok, pushed now. Thanks! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
