On 2015-12-14 13:48, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 14 December 2015 at 17:58, David Henningsson > <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: >> My understanding of all this is a bit limited, but it seems we already do >> this for libpulsecommon without issue. >> >> I'm not sure how much it is upstream and how much is packaging, but on my >> Ubuntu system it looks like /usr/bin/pulseaudio (and libpulse.so) both have >> a >> >> RPATH /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pulseaudio >> >> ...that cause us to find libpulsecomon (and presumably, libpulsecore). I >> thought we weren't using RPATH, but apparently I'm mistaken. >> >> Anyhow. If nobody else complains I don't mind this one going in. Anyone with >> more knowledge who can fill in? > > This one does look okay to go in from my side. afaik we do use rpath > on Linux (doesn't work with Android/bionic-based stuff, though). Ok, pushed now. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic