On 14 December 2015 at 17:58, David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: > My understanding of all this is a bit limited, but it seems we already do > this for libpulsecommon without issue. > > I'm not sure how much it is upstream and how much is packaging, but on my > Ubuntu system it looks like /usr/bin/pulseaudio (and libpulse.so) both have > a > > RPATH /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pulseaudio > > ...that cause us to find libpulsecomon (and presumably, libpulsecore). I > thought we weren't using RPATH, but apparently I'm mistaken. > > Anyhow. If nobody else complains I don't mind this one going in. Anyone with > more knowledge who can fill in? This one does look okay to go in from my side. afaik we do use rpath on Linux (doesn't work with Android/bionic-based stuff, though). -- Arun